Home Search

EDT - search results

If you're not happy with the results, please do another search

0 1

The thing that excites me most about the web is the idea of taking back the means of cultural production, even if only for a moment. That’s probably why ds106 still remains the higlight of my time as an edtech. I felt like a group of people coordinated their energy in order to take over the means of both production and distribution. They created in a variety of ways, often times as an interactive critique of the media culture within which they exist. I had joked quite a bit when ds106radio and ds106tv were emerging that we controlled the “vertical and the horizontal” —the “outter limits” of cultural production. For a moment it felt like we truly were the network—and that was sublime.

Now there are limits to the time and energy any given group of people can devote to something so intense, and you can’t force it. It comes when it comes, and goes when it goes. That said, there are some conditions you can create to make the soil more fertile, and I that’s what I see as the real value of the Connected Courses experience running this fall. A whole bunch of people will be workig together to frame the conditions of possibility that might engender magic in a connected course, acknowledging that networked magic is often tied to a whole lot of labor.

I like the way Laura Hilliger frames the class in her post about it earlier today:

The coursework will help you understand how we work in the digital space by demystifying the tools and trade of openness. We’ll explore why you might run a Connectivist learning experience, how to get started, how to connect online and offline participants, and how to MAKE things that support this kind of learning.

We’ll talk about building networks, maintaining networks, diversifying networks and living and working in a connected space. We’ll learn together, share ideas and start making action plans for our own connected courses.

A course like this is all about demistifying the means of production to lay bear how one might run a connected course. She also alludes to the intense work it takes to build and maintain networks, diversify your connections, and work collaboratively to build your online identity.  There’s a lot of labor involved, but that can be rewarded with the sense of real accomplishment and empowerment that results from building not only your own connected course hub—but your online networks.

But the real reason to do it doesn’t have nearly as much to do with laying bear the materialism of the web or raging against institutional siloes or building your network—though all of those would get you a passing grade on the test. The real reason is there’s possibility of magic in such an approach. There’s a point where the time, energy, and faith in a seed of networked learning could transform into an experience of taking over the means of cultural production for even a moment—creating a networked space where you’re course transforms into a community of people become producers, distributors, and consumers simulataneosuly. The vertical and the horizontal. That’s become the high watermark of online, open, connected learning for me, and my paltry contribution to Connected Courses is trying to share and model how a group of us built the infrastrcuture, communtiy, and ethos around ds106.

    0 0

    Mikhail Gershovich

    Mikhail-headshot1Mikhail Gershovich is a teacher, speaker and educational technology consultant currently based in Los Angeles. He is the former Executive Director of the Bernard L. Schwartz Communication Institute at Baruch College, City University of New York and has led many innovative curricular initiatives around writing, speaking, new media and free and open source digital tools. Projects include Blogs@Baruch (http://baruch.cuny.edu/blogs), one of the largest, most active academic open online publishing platforms anywhere; cac.ophony.org, an award-winning blog by the Schwartz Communication Institute’s Fellows, and VOCAT, a fully featured video assessment application (http://vocat.io). Mikhail is an early and active participant in the DS106 digital storytelling community, especially in DS106Radio, and has served the CUNY Academic Commons Advisory Committee, the CUNY Skunkworks EdTech R&D group, and on editorial councils of the Journal of Basic Writing and the Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy (JITP). He holds a PhD in English from the CUNY Graduate Center and has taught many undergraduate and graduate courses in composition, literature, film and new media at Baruch College, CUNY Graduate Center, Northeastern University and SUNY Old Westbury.

      0 0

      Pre Course

      Welcome to Blog Talk

      blog-talkHello and welcome to Blog Talk on DML Public Radio, with us “Click,” “Link” and “Embed,” the Connected Brothers, and we are broadcasting this week from… the Connected Courses website.

      Woah, are there a lot of elite educators connecting in to this course. We have no idea why they put us on stage first, but there you go.

      We hope the nice folks at NPR understand the possible similarity between what we do and a little show they run over there — it’s just a coincidence! If they give us some flack, they might hear from our lawyers, Dooey, Blogum and Howe.

      blog-talk-garage

      This pre-course is an opportunity for you to get your blogs on the road, because that is the place you will be doing most of your work in Connected Courses. The three of us have tons of experience working inside the engines of these machines. But, we are still learning as we tinker — Brother Click is still driving a theme from 2008, Link can barely type a sentence without a type, and Embed sometimes struggles to get his GIFs animated.

      Before going nuts and bolts, we will touch on some broader questions:

      Why open learning? Why create your own space, domain, host? Why use your own tools? Why be a node on the web? Why is this important? What does connected learning mean?

      We know these blog machines pretty well, but the choice of what you drive is up to you — anything from the fully get inside the engine running your domain and installing something like WordPress. But, you can also choose to just drive a reliable model off of the lot from WordPress.com, Blogger, tumblr, or a few of the other dealers down the highway.

      For Week 1 – 9/2-5/14

      Our first reference is a post summarizing some of these options as well as how to get your jalopy plugged into the Connected Courses site so your posts appear right there in the flow of the front page.

      If you are new to tooling around in a blog, we have a few suggestions to help you start Blogging Like a Connected Courses Champion, using media, linking — but truly, we expect that you will develop a style that fits your interests as you get out there and publish more.

      On Sept. 2, 2014, at 10 a.m. Pacific Time (check for your local time), we will host our first live call-in show, via Google Hangout. We will review these topics, but really hope some of you pull your blog into the garage and we can take a look at your site and maybe give you a tune up.

      Week 2 – 9/8-12/14

      We will keep the garage open to address all questions related to Week 1, but for those interested in the full fledged blog vehicles, we will introduce you to the capabilities of a full cPanel dashboard and what that affords individuals.

      Our second call-in show is set for Friday, Sept. 12, at 2 p.m. Pacific Time. This is yet another chance for you to pull into the garage, put your blog up on the tracks, and let us give you a free checkup.

      So, that’s the plan for the pre-course, a chance to get your blog machines running like race cars, so when Connected Courses goes into full motion on Sept. 15, you are ready to write and connect, and not worry too much about the mechanics of blogging.

      Welcome to Blog Talk!

      Oh — and one more thing — Don’t blog like my brother!

      Click, Link, and Embed
      The Connected Brothers

      Orientation

      Unit 1

      Unit 2

      Unit 3

      Unit 4

      Unit 5

      Unit 6

        0 0

        Kira Baker-Dolye

        3aa832446d9e69d7f54df32a048b4c0d

        Dr. Kira J. Baker-Doyle is an Assistant Professor of Education and the Director of the Literacies, Technologies and Citizenship Studies Programs in the School of Education at Arcadia University. She co-created and facilitates the Connected Learning Certificate program, an institutionally-distributed program designed to cultivate K-16+ educators’ leadership, networking, and engagement in Connected Learning. Her research centers on teacher professional development, social network theory, and community engagement, especially in urban schools and communities. She is the author of The Networked Teacher: How New Teachers Build Social Networks for Professional Support, published by Teachers College Press. Dr. Baker-Doyle conducts workshops and academic talks for diverse audiences of teachers and scholars about her research on teachers’ social support networks, and has worked with national organizations such as the National Writing Project and the Children’s Literacy Initiative. At Arcadia, Dr. Baker-Doyle teaches courses in writing and literacies. She has a special interest in the use of online technologies and multi-media to support student learning and community-building. She frequently discusses these interests in her blog, http://kbakerdoyle.wordpress.com, where she documents and discusses critical issues in education, connected learning, civic engagement, and mindful practices. She is also an avid twitterer (@KJBD), occasionally hosting an open #networkedteacherchat as part of her courses.

        0 0
        creative commons licensed (BY-NC) flickr photo by mrkrndvs: http://flickr.com/photos/aaron_davis/14606572678


        I have spoken elsewhere about how I have become a connected educator. However, I have not necessarily spoken about those who have had an ongoing influence on me. +Cameron Paterson talks about finding someone who scares you to drive you, but I feel that it is more important to find some who inspires you and drives you forward. Sometimes such moments can be intimidating or awe inspiring. They provide us with a choice, we can either say that is too hard and baulk at the challenge or say that although it is a lot of work, with a bit more effort and endeavour I could achieve that too.

        Although 'influence and inspiration' exists outside of gender, I am inspired by a tweet from +Julie Bytheway to be more equitable. So I have decided to split my list between two five men and five women. So in no particular order, here are ten people who have made an impact on my journey and my first year of blogging ...

        +danah boyd

        I can't remember the list I found, but Boyd was one of the first people I started following when I got on Twitter. I would read her posts and relish the different perspectives which she provided. Boyd's work has helped me realise that there are different ways of seeing teens and internet, as was documented in her fantastic book It's Complicated, which I reviewed here.

        +Peter DeWitt

        DeWitt completely changed the way I saw Twitter and being a connected educator. Although I had connected with many other teachers, DeWitt was the first leader who I connected with. I had grown up surrounded by some great leaders, however they did not always share so openly and honestly. I can't even remember how I came upon DeWitt's blog, but it soon became a staple of my digital diet. Even when talking about tales and topics with little direct influence on my own day to day happenings, it is his endeavour to always keep the conversation going is what I aspire to the most and keeps me coming back.

        Jason Borton

        Although I had engaged with various school leaders from abroad both directly, as in the case with +Peter DeWitt, but also through such spaces as Connected Principals, Borton was the first 'local' principal who really changed the way I saw things at home. (Bit ironic how in a global world Canberra and Melbourne become local.) Whether it be questioning homework, reporting and whole school enabling, he has engaged with all those big topics on both Twitter and through his blog that from my experience many leaders baulk at. It was actually through Borton that I came upon Edutweetoz and the +TER Podcast, two other priceless points of perspective and great ambassadors for more empowered voices in education.

        +Jenny Ashby

        As I have discussed elsewhere, Jenny was very much the start of my connected journey. I am always inspired by how much she manages to achieve. Whether this be her podcasts (RU Connected or AU2AZ) or here involvement in such projects as Skype Around the World in 24 Hours and Slide2Learn. What amazes me the most about Jenny is that it would be so easy for her not to be involved in many of these things, distance to travel or quality of internet connection. However, from my experiences with Ashby, she often seems to find some reason to be involved, rather than an excuse not to be. Great mindset.

        +Doug Belshaw

        I came upon Belshaw via his phenomenal work around digital literacies. However, what stands out the most to me is his sharing and giving back. People tell me that I write a lot, then I ask them if they follow Doug's work. In addition to this, he is always pushing the envelope, question and critiquing, innovating for tomorrow, rather than living for today. Take for example his recent push to take back ownership of his data by self-hosting his own email. Although this may seem an impossible task, many great changes in history have been started by a lone nut who takes a stand.

        +Richard Olsen

        If ever I want a different perspective on something, I often go to Olsen. He always finds something that I have missed or puts a different spin on things. As I have stated elsewhere, a part of me lives for such critical engagement. Really though, what I respect most about Olsen is that instead of simply writing things off, ignoring them, carrying his own conversation, he puts in the time and effort to fuel the wildfire of learning and keep the conversation going.

        +Pernille Ripp

        Ripp has been a constant inspiration ever since i got online. Unlike many who perpetuate change from the top down, Ripp is a great example of what is possible from the bottom up. One of her greatest attributes is her openness and honesty. Although it can be easy to consider Ripp as taking 'risks' and going beyond the perceived status quo, what she has taught me is that in some respect we are all risk takers, whether we like it or not. That we are all making a choice. I think that what makes some people like Ripp empowering and important is that they own the choices and decisions. I must admit that I spent the first few years as a teacher thinking that it wasn't my roll or right to make big decisions, I thought that was the role of those above to feed down 'best practise'. However, when those answers never arrived I realised that change starts with me today in my classroom and that there is no time to wait.

        +Amy Burvall 

        Like Belshaw, Burvall's ability to seemingly achieve so much is a constant reminder that there is always something more I could be doing. In addition to her awesome amount of sharing online, she has also influenced the way I consider the assessment of art and creativity. She has also introduced me to the potential of some amazing applications, such as Mozilla Popcorn and Paper53. To me, Burvall demonstrates that there is no limit to engagement with and through digital literacies, instead the only limit is ourselves.

        Inquire Within

        I am not sure exactly when I came upon +Edna Sackson's group blog, Inquire Within, however it has become an important part of my growth in regards to teaching and learning. Having had a mixed past when it comes to inquiry, something I have discussed elsewhere, Inquire Within has brushed away so many misconceptions. I think that my greatest fault was to think that inquiry could actually be defined, rather than be what it actually is, a myriad of combinations which form to make different pedagogical cocktails. During my time following the site, I have come upon so many great posts and awesome ideas there, such as +Bianca Hewes 'Managing the Mushy Middle' and Kath Murdoch's 'How do Inquiry Teachers Teach?' Along with Ripp's blog, Inquire Within is often one of the first sites that I recommend to other teachers in regards to teaching and learning.

        +Ed Tech Crew

        When I think of influences, I find it hard to go beyond the +Ed Tech Crew. Whether it be guests on the program, such as +Ian Guest and +Alec Couros, the community curation in the Diigo group or the dialogue and discussion between +Darrel Branson and +Tony Richards, there is so much sharing that occurs. I have lost count of the thoughts and ideas that have taken seed via the +Ed Tech Crew. In addition to this, I have also been lucky enough to share my thoughts of Melbourne Google in Education Summit 2013, as well as my thoughts on leading ICT and where we have come in regards to technology in education. It was sad to hear that the +Ed Tech Crew would actually be going into hiatus. However, it is also a recognition that it takes a village.

        ...

        The Word 'I' Refers To ...

        It is good to recognise our influences in life. However, one of the problems with such a practise is that there will always be someone missed or overlooked. I was really taken by Jack Welch's statement that "nearly everything I have done has been accomplished with other people" as quoted in Carol Dweck's book Mindset. In some vague attempt to recongise some of these 'other people' I have listed all the people who I have mentioned through my many blogs over the last year: +John Moravec +Kevin Miklasz +Troy MONCUR +Tom Whitby +Andrew Williamson +Joe Mazza +Peter Kent +Rich Lambert +Corrie Barclay +John Pearce +Deb Hicks +Seth Godin +Ian Guest +Suan Yeo +Jim Sill +Chris Betcher +Anthony Speranza +Mike Reading +Jason Markey +George Couros +David Truss +Tom March +Vicki Davis +Ben Gallagher +Rebecca Davies +Anne Mirtschin +Adam Bellow +stephen heppell +David Tuffley +Tony Sinanis +Dan Rockwell +Alf Galea +Mel Cashen +Matt Esterman +Darrel Branson +Ashley Proud +Ryan Tate +Roland Gesthuizen +Aubrey Daniels International +Catherine Gatt +Celia Coffa +Kynan Robinson +Mark O'Meara +Lois Smethurst +Darren Murphy +Mark Barnes +Chris Wejr +Doug Belshaw +Miguel Guhlin +TER Podcast +Bianca Hewes +Luis López-Cano +John Spencer +Tom Panarese +Edna Sackson +David Zyngier +Cameron Malcher +Mariana Funes +dave cormier +Dick Faber +Ewan McIntosh +Darryn Swaby +David Price +Alan Thwaites +Stephen Harris +Corey Aylen +Simon Crook +Nick Jackson +Simon Ensor +maureen maher +Keith Hamon +John Thomas +Margo Edgar +Jan Molloy +Kim Yeomans +John Bennett +Will Richardson +Bec Spink +Sam Irwin +Corinne Campbell +Rick Kayler-Thomson +Adam Lavars +Heather Bailie +Dean Shareski +Stephen Collis +Michelle Hostrup +Starr Sackstein +Charles Arthur +Craig Kemp +David Weinberger +Eric Jensen and +Katelyn Fraser. Although extensive, these are simply people whose thoughts and ideas I have been conscious of, emerged from the noise. For as +Keith Hamon recently suggested in an interesting post on authorship, "while I can find sources for all of my ideas, I'm not sure that they are my sources, but I am sure that it doesn't matter."

        0 0

        I’ve been writing nonstop for almost two weeks.

        I work in a place that is about to unveil an entirely new agenda, one related to connected learning in higher education at its most passionate and most digital. My major contribution to this launch has been writing the Case for Connected Learning, a “white paper”-esque entity which will eventually end up on the website.

        It is true that I have thrown my full self into this job; if anyone asked, I would tell them that I have walked to work from my car every morning, telling myself to smite with a legendary sword. Ok for smiting, which tends to be my natural state, but something else has been going on too -- something worth blogging about.

        Grad student writing is, in general, an odd and unnatural thing.  In some ways, it’s not so much about the content as the ability to write in APA (or MLA or Chicago).  There’s an art to APA, for sure, but it’s an impersonal game –the same game that an excellent medical student (and I was an excellent medical student) masters as they roll through the multiple-choice based case studies of the Step examinations.  It's not particularly student-centered, if you think about it.

        APA shapes the grad student writing experience, making assignments impersonal and personal at the same time; yes, you will judge me on my ability to play the APA game, but I am not synonymous with my ability to write in APA.  Funny how this sort of writing protects a grad student in some ways, but limits her in others.  Among other things, I am limited by the desperate need for validation when I write in APA – I need a second opinion on my ability to play the game.

        But what I’ve written recently – it’s an entirely different thing. I was told to write anything other than an ordinary white paper.  No joke. I was told to write as myself, the natural smiter.

        Well, I’m not APA.  I read the Atlantic.  I read Time.  I love a little Brian Williams and a lot of Maria Popova.  And Paul Simons and Regina Spektor.  And Ingrid Michaelson and Isabel Allende and Ernest Hemingway.  And if I could land a gig as a Woman Correspondent We Love for Esquire, I would drop this doctoral degree with poetic speed and rock myself (and the babies) all the way to a scotch whisky and a cigar in Midtown NYC. 

        It turns out that after all these years of dictating patient charts and writing research papers, I like to write with a little bit of poetry and a lot of storytelling served saucy-like on a smoking slab of APA.

        And the most interesting part of this experiment (to me, at least) is how I feel about others reading it.  For the first time in my grad career, I don’t care what you think about what I wrote.  If Gardner Campbell gives me constructive criticism (and I’m sure he will), that’s is perfectly fine and I will eagerly make the corrections.  Maybe I’ll even learn something. But ultimately, I feel like I have come out of this experience knowing me and my writing better than I did a month ago. 
        And it’s good, just the way it is.  I don’t need validation from anyone.


        So, I guess my advice to all of you graduate student advisors is to make sure your students have at least one opportunity to write as themselves and not as slaves to the good people at APA.  I don’t mean throwing them a reflective paper or two; I mean an all-out, big bad 5000 words of something.  Something with punch and power.  Tell them to go balls-to-the-wall and see what happens.  Having that opportunity has been the most valuable grad student experience I’ve had yet.  I can only hope that others have the same opportunity.

        0 0

        This post and associated slides are for my TL21C Reboot Session addressing the topic of: Becoming a Connected Educator (22/7/2014)


        Becoming a Connected Educator (TL21C) - Created with Haiku Deck, presentation software that inspires

        Becoming a connected educator is so unique. There is no rule or recipe to follow and no two stories are the same. The reality is that it is many things to many people. The biggest challenge is continually defining what it actually means to be connected and why it is important. I don't wish to offer some cure, rather I hope to keep the conversation going.

        Instead of providing a recipe, my approach has always been to share some of the choices that I have made and my thoughts behind them. Although signing up to various platforms is important, it is the journey associated with this that matters most to me. As +Tony Sinanis says, in reflecting on his own connected experiences, "the Twitter experience is a journey ... it is not an experience that can simply be replicated for those who have yet to be connected."

        It is important to understand that being a connected educator does not automatically make you a better learner. Just because you have a Twitter handle doesn't make you special in itself. Although it may give you access to a global audience, this does not magically make you connected. As +David Weinberger points out in his book Too Big To Know, “Even if the smartest person in the room is the room itself, the room does not magically make all who enter it smarter.” The question that we need to consider is not whether we are connected or not, but rather how we connect.

        Too often people believe that being connected somehow leads to something more, a conduit to some higher form of being. They enter with the question, 'What's in it for me?' I am not sure exactly what I thought being a connected educator would be, however the one thing that I have come to realise is that networks are not constant, they are more akin to a verb, rather than a noun.

        Too often people describe PLN's as something we build. However this misses the organic nature. I believe that they are better understood as a plant which we help grow and nurture. Our networks will only ever flourish as much as we let them.

        Associated with the focus on networks is a focus on learning. To get the most out of being connected I allocate learning time. In a recent post+Peter Skillen made the suggestion that the goal of a project should be to formulate questions, rather than starting with one. I think that this definitely applies to being connected. Sometimes you just need to tinker and play, wonder and explore, in order to know what it is you are looking for.

        I feel that connecting and conversing is better thought of as sitting at a bar drinking pedagogical cocktails where we can mix different ingredients to come up with our own flavours. This does not mean that everyone should do Problem Based Learning or didactic learning should be banished, instead it is about choosing the right method for the moment, rather than keep on drinking the same old cocktail again and again.

        One of the most empowering aspects about learning online is that there is always some form of learning just waiting for us. As +Alec Couros suggested, "some of the best learning happens each day on Youtube whether it is meant to happen or not" I once described this as 'hidden professional development', playing on the idea of the hidden curriculum, but I really like +John Pearce's notion of pop-up PD, that learning that can happen anywhere, any time, where there are people willing to learn.

        One of the keys to learning online is actually giving back. If everyone just lurked from a distance, not only would this limit the depth of conversations that occur online, but it also limits how much you actually get out of such connections. There are many different ways of giving back, from simply sharing links to remixing ideas. The choice of how we do this is up to us.

        Sharing should be thought of as a way of being. Many worry about whether there is worth in what they are sharing. However, only the community can decide such worth. As Clive Thompson states in reference to blogging, "Having an audience can clarify thinking. It’s easy to win an argument inside your head. But when you face a real audience, you have to be truly convincing." Surely then sharing can only be a good thing?

        One of the most important elements to building relationships is having a clear and definable identity. After spending some time hiding behind various quirky images and username, inspired by +Anne Mirtschin, I took the steps to create a consistent digital badge that I 'wear' online. Associated with this, I developed an About.Me to connect together  all the different spaces where I exist. I feel that making these changes has aided with my connections.

        In the end, there are many choices to be made when it comes to being a connected educator. For example:
        • Who do I follow?
        • What details do I provide about myself?
        • Which platforms should I work on?
        • Should I blog, vlog, create a podcast?
        • How many times should I re-tweet/republish links to my own work?
        As +Chris Wejr points out, although it is easy to suggest that everyone should sign up and start sharing every last detail, not everyone is able to tweet and post who they are.

        I think that +Steve Brophy sums up the situation best when he makes the challenge, "Be the connection that gives other learners a voice."

        What has been your biggest hurdle in becoming a more connected educator? Can you provide an example as to how you are giving other learners a voice?