Home Syndicated

Syndicated

This is the firehose, all external content syndicated into the site.

0 0

RT @MindShiftKQED: Learning is an intensely personal, messy journey, distinct from training http://t.co/ONf7ivOx8M #edchat #edtech
— DML Research Hub (@dmlresearchhub) August 29, 2014

Learning is an intensely personal, messy journey.

Because of the way the web tends to work, often with homogeneous groups clustering around concepts and perspectives they already love, I suspect that most of the people who read the DML Research Hub tweet, above, nodded knowingly before they retweeted it or moved on to the next one in their feed.  But if you stop to think about it, "Learning is an intensely personal, messy journey" is not the way a lot of people think about learning or education.

Until a few years ago, I certainly didn't think of it that way. There was nothing personal or student-centered about a perfect score on a standardized test. And messiness, uncertainty, vulnerability, struggle - those were all indications of a lack of professionalism or preparation, depending on the context. My discomfort with the personal, messy nature of learning has played itself out in my relationship with my own blog.  Out of necessity, my blog is a place for me to struggle and experiment.  But just because vulnerability is necessary for learning doesn't mean I've always worn my struggles like honor ribbons.  As a student and occasional teacher I find myself confronting my habits of instruction-centeredness all the time.  I have to remind myself that it's acceptable to struggle publicly while learning; to value process knowledge, reflective practice, and meta analysis over content acquisition; to concentrate on projects that suit my interests; and to question and occasionally challenge my doctoral program requirements and cultural expectations. I'm fighting to transform my own assumptions about learning--a paradigm of depersonalized, compartmentalized learning--all the time.

As I struggle to adopt a kinder, more holistic, inclusive, flexible, and joyful framework for education (my own and others), I find Connected Learning to be an ongoing source of inspiration.  I am very excited to participate in #ConnectedCourses because I need as much exposure to the concepts as I can get; exposure leads to confrontation of current beliefs, and ultimately transformation.  That, plus the people leading the sessions write some pretty interesting stuff :)




0 0
I love it when my different social and professional worlds start to collide in productive ways. These past few weeks I've been delighted to see more and more bridges being built across the world of higher education where I sit as a faculty member, and ...

0 0

One of the core tenets of my courses at Marylhurst University is context. When we work to define context for our study, we provide a framework for broader understanding of the world around us. We’re then able to see how we impact culture, and how culture thereby impacts us in return. 

I love this stuff. I’m sure most of my students hate me by the time we’re through with our time together. No, it’s not a new thing, but it’s my thing, and I’m sticking to it. 

That’s why I’m so excited to be participating in ConnectedCourses this month with talented educators and thinkers. The premise: 

Connected Courses is a collaborative community of faculty in higher education developing networked, open courses that embody the principles of connected learning and the values of the open web.

In short, we’re studying together the promise of federated learning, learning that counts on educators and learners building their own platforms and connecting them together using open web technologies. These instructors have been building courses calling on students to publish their own blogs, learning in public, syndicating the results of their studies in a way that leverages collaboration in a new, exciting — and terrifying — fashion. 

I’ve been teaching using a closed platform by comparison, Moodle. Moodle is a wonderful open source tool, but the implementation of it at my institution is closed, a space in which students are able to connect with one another — the 15 or so students in their own cohort — but isolated from the braintrust outside the university’s walled garden. 

As a result, students lose control of their work when finished with each course. But what about their opportunity — their obligation — to contribute to the body of knowledge? What about their ability to control the work they’ve done, to share it beyond the confines of the course? These things pain me each time I cross a brilliant insight from my students, and it’s becoming more and more clear to me that part of my role as an instructor goes beyond lectures, probes, and assessments. It’s about teaching students to contribute more fully as a member of our society. 

Even as my own institution’s technology defaults to closed, I’m heartened by two things. First, I have been consistently supported in my own meager experiments to push the classroom experience with new tools and experience with media. Second, our own Dr. Nathan Phillips, director of our Center for Learning and Technology, invited me to join this course. That speaks volumes toward the institutional awareness of change and the promise of greater, broader connections to come. 

0 0
This post marks the official post into our journey through the Connected Courses Active Co-Learning online course.  In the true spirit of active co-learning, we have set up an in person group (if you’re in West Yorkshire, you’re welcome to join!), Twitter group and plan to use this webspace (which Erin and Nick already use) […]

0 0
Frequently, when I type the word “technology,” I accidentally type “teachnology.” It seems appropriate to me since I believe that technology is an effective way to teach students. I like